The rationale behind every eligibility criterion, before the protocol is final.
For protocol authors and review teams in oncology. ProtocolOS prepares the rationale; the team decides.
How it works
- Pick a trial or an ideaReview a posted protocol, or draft criteria for a new concept.
- Read the rationaleEach criterion shows its likely rationale, which arm it comes from where a drug link exists, and what similar trials used.
- Redraft, then decideRewrite the criterion, watch the deterministic checks update as you type, then record the team's reason.
Finishing a trialReview an existing protocolOpen a posted oncology protocol. Each lab, ECOG, washout and condition criterion gets its likely rationale (inferred unless the protocol states it), the arm whose drugs are linked to it where a drug link exists, the values similar trials used, and the deterministic verifier's verdict on any other limit you propose.Open the reviewCreate criteria from an ideaDraft criteria for a new conceptDescribe the condition, drugs and setting. ProtocolOS proposes values only from verified precedents, then critiques its own draft; otherwise it says Insufficient evidence.Start a draft
Four worked examples and the draft examples open at once. Adding another trial, drafting a new idea and model answers in the Ask tab use your own OpenAI or Anthropic API key; this server has no model key of its own.
Public sources only. Rationale in non-public sources (preclinical toxicology, internal development data, regulator correspondence) cannot be seen by ProtocolOS.
Take the 7-step guided tour